Imagine you’ve won the lottery. The next morning you wake up and find
that you won again. That’s how the investors and executives at 3PAR are
feeling these days. The dueling takeover offers from HP and Dell for the
relatively obscure 3PAR left many in the investment community – and for
that matter in the storage industry – scratching their heads.
The heart of this bid – beyond the obviously testerone-fueled frenzy
culminating with a bid with sky-high multiples – was a weakness that HP
reportedly began attempting to resolve 9 months ago. HP resells HDS
(Hitachi Data Systems) equipment into the enterprise. The trouble is that
HDS also sells HDS gear into the enterprise; thus HP’s value proposition
was weak. Combine that with the fact that HDS is seen in the industry as
increasingly being left behind by more agile and more nimble competitors and
HP had a problem... (more)
Unitrends is supporting byte-level deduplication on its backup appliances
with its release 6 (due this month – March, 2010.) Since there’s some
confusion concerning byte-level versus block-level deduplication, I thought
I’d take the opportunity to explain the differences between file-level
deduplication (what Unitrends supported prior to release 6), block-level
deduplication, and byte-level deduplication.
File-level deduplication operates by eliminating redundant files. Despite
what many pundits state, file deduplication is very efficient (and note that
I’m stating this even ... (more)
“I’m betting that they’re [appliances] are game changers, because the
whole premise of these machines goes far, far beyond the no-value concept of
simply taking two five-pound bags of concrete and combining them into one
10-pound bag, and calling that innovation.”
[Bob Evans, InformationWeek]
The cover of InformationWeek on September 27, 2010, pictured a towering rack
and the headline “Rise of the Appliance.” While all of the examples from
the article came from massive companies like Oracle and IBM, the truth is
that almost everything discussed in the article is directly applica... (more)
Recently there was an interesting blog post by Scott Raymond entitled
“Where Are the Affordable Enterprise Online Backups?” I made a comment to
it – to the effect that bandwidth and RTO (Recovery Time Objective) are
incompatible. That caused some other comments to be made. I decided to
write a bit longer post concerning the entire phenomenon on this blog.
First of all, the term “enterprise online backup” is a bit misleading.
What the author of the post was complaining about was that there are no
unlimited storage options with associated flat-rate pricing of the sort in
the co... (more)
After the SAN backup fiasco in Virgina, I started thinking about how how far
we’ve gotten from the concept of what backup is really all about. Imagine
the following scenario from a college football game this weekend:
[In the middle of a nationally televised football game a linebacker blitzes
and catches the quarterback on the blind side; the quarterback's leg snapping
is audible to the sideline microphones.]
Trainer: Coach, your first-string quarterback, Tom, has a broken leg. You
need to get your backup in there.
Coach: Okay. Let’t get Tom in there.
Trainer: I don’t think that... (more)
- VAR Rejects Higher Priced Deduplication One Trick Ponies
- SAN Backup – or How to Make DMVs Even More Hellish
- Data Protection Vendor Unitrends Revives Hospital's IT Infrastructure
- VMware and Windows Quiescing for Crash-Consistent Backups
- NetBackup 5000 Backup Appliance: Welcome to the Party
- Backup, Capital Expenditure, Depreciation, and the Small Business Jobs Act
- Backup, Primary Deduplication, and Solaris ZFS
- Backup, Deduplication, and Incremental Forever
- Backup Appliances and Integrated Support
- Backup, Capital Expenditure, Depreciation, and the Small Business Jobs Act